The Debasement of Susie Wiles

I don’t know how much time you have spent with families deep in grief, but I have spent an inordinate amount of time with such people. As a reporter, I interviewed grieving parents after they lost a daughter in a car wreck, a mother who delivered a dead baby, a solider nurse who was forced to let a premature baby die, a grown woman who as a teenager watched her cousin get bombed, parents whose 15-year old son died of alcohol poisoning, a Texas Ranger whose son died in a fiery car crash days after he arrived home from duty in a war zone, parents whose son was killed in a shoot out with local police, grandparents whose youngest grand died by suicide at age 14, women who’ve died from breast cancer, the sister of two Hispanic boys, ages 10 and 12, struck by a van as they crossed a busy road, and so many survivors of people murdered or those killed in action in war zones that I have lost count.

Not to mention writing about the deaths of my own parents, one to cancer, one to war.

Never once did it occur to me to denigrate, demean, or defile people in such moments. In every instance I tried to offer the one thing I always longed for myself – a heart that listens. I’ve written before about the silence that surrounded my father’s death and how lonely it was to sit in such silence. My friend Hugh Hollowell says the thing that someone hurting really needs is for a soul willing to sit in the dark alongside them. I have tried to be that person. I try still to be that person.

I have zero tolerance for people who condemn the grieving by saying they just need to get over it. Some years ago, I overheard two women yapping about the recent death of a beloved spouse of a third woman. These two women felt that the widow went on too much about her husband’s passing. They gossiped back and forth about how they felt that her grief should be more private, keep it to herself, nobody wants to be bothered by another person’s grief. Too attention seeking, they concluded.

The whole conversation got on my last nerve. While I didn’t know these people, didn’t interrupt their conversation, I was struck by how comfortable they felt making judgements about the grief others. If you are my friend and you lose a loved one, through death or divorce or just divergent paths, I’m going to do my best to sit in that dark space with you. I don’t have any pithy advice to offer, no quick fixes to staunch the flow of tears that come in the heat of longing or the sacred silence of mourning. I got nothing to offer really, other than I’m here, willing to listen.

It’s because of all those hours I’ve spent in that space with the grieving that I, like you, was mortified by the cruelty of Trump’s remarks about the murders of Rob and Michelle Reiner. I’m not going to repost Trump’s hateful message here. A simple search will bring it up.

Without question his remarks were some of the most vile remarks ever sputtered by a sitting US president. And if you are sitting silent or pretending like it was all no big deal, the way Susie Wiles does every single day that she serves as his Chief of Staff, or drumming up some shameful defense of Trump, you might as well spew that hateful rhetoric out of your own pie hole.

I will not tolerate hearing one more person pretending that they aren’t as cruel as the man they elected. They take cover behind their own self-righteousness, claiming they like his policies but wish he’d shut his mouth. The bible is clear on this one issue: Evil company corrupts good habits. (I Corinthians 15:33 NJV). And just in case you haven’t been paying attention, Trump is evil company and he surrounds himself with equally as evil people promoting evil policies.

They are murdering boat people.

They are disappearing US citizens.

They are terrorizing the poor.

They are letting murderers and sex abusers and violent men and women out of prison.

They are flooding the country with thugs and criminals.

They are hosting leaders of genocides in the Oval Office.

They are denying human rights to the masses and the marginalized.

They have caged people. Literally put them in cages.

They have separated children from parents.

They’ve denied food from the starving.

They’ve cut medical care for the sick & denied vaccines that protect babies.

They demonize those working hard to make a living.

They’ve unemployed millions and then denied benefits to sustain them.

All while diverting billions to their already wealthy friends and themselves.

On and on and on it goes. All aided and abetted by Republicans in Congress and your neighbors and mine, who continue to pretend none of this is happening, and even if it is, it’s not so bad.

Or like Susie Wiles, who helps masterminds it all and then denies any responsibility for the cruelty or deaths that result because of her actions.

Women like Susie Wiles have always betrayed the American people in order to win the approval of men who mockingly demean them.

Wiles may think of herself as a powerful woman but the reality is what sort of power is it when you have to defile yourself before a psychopath like Trump? Or Vance? Or Hegseth? Or any number of Republican men who get their jollies out of debasing others? The way Trump did when he wrote that post following the tragic murders of the Reiners.

Trump’s hunger to be praised is rooted in his overwhelming fear, and denial of the knowledge that he will never elicit the kind of admiration, devotion and sheer love that Rob and Michelle Reiner did from people the world over.

And neither will Susie Wiles.

Karen Spears Zacharias

Author/Journalist/Educator. Gold Star Daughter.

8 Comments

Travis

about 7 months ago

It's kind of interesting how President Trump's comments about Mr Reiner's murder and people's reactions to them are in some way like the mirror opposite (switch Democrat with Republican and vice versa) of Mr. Kimmel's comments about Mr. Kirk's murder and people's reactions to them.

Reply

Karen Spears Zacharias

about 7 months ago

Travis: I don't know why you continue to come to this page. It is clear we hold completely opposing views on Trump. And your suggestion that Kimmel or for that matter any Democrat leader's comments following Kirk's assassination are in anyway equal to the vile despicable comments Trump made in the wake of these tragic murders is only deception on your behalf. Not surprising, really, given the cult you have devoted yourself to.

Reply

Travis

about 7 months ago

To be clear, I haven't read or heard the full content of either of the remarks. But I understand that in both instances the person somewhat made light of the murder and implied that the victim was in part at fault for their own death. Then they were both fairly roundly and bipartisanly condemned for their remarks. That's my general understanding of the situation.

Reply

Karen Spears Zacharias

about 7 months ago

How does one do that? Make claims about who said what, as part of a defense of Trump, without having taken the time to actually look at the evidence to support an argument? Do you not see that is part of the problem with Trump supporters? Not doing any reading of your own. Not one minute of researching before arguing on behalf of a man who is supremely unfit for the office he holds? This is exactly what forms the basis of a cult.

Reply

about 7 months ago

Dear Karen, To respond in order: Why do I continue coming here? For one thing, I appreciate your heart. It seems that you have some love for some people. Also as a life principle I believe polite open dialogue is healthy. It helps people mature in their thinking and to better understand the perspectives of others. If I have been rude some times, please forgive me. That is a sin tendency I have, but in my heart of hearts I don't think I want to be. Also I am able to visit your site and leave comments without having to agree to any "Terms and Conditions". I am not 100% sure what you are calling a "cult". I am assuming you don't mean Christianity but rather "MAGA"ism. If that is the case, I don't necessarily disagree. I am actually somewhat ambivalent about President Trump. I did not vote for him in 2024, but I do think I prefer hum being president than Ms. Harris. Also I do try to show respect towards all people, even if I believe they are immoral or deceived to one degree or another.

Reply

Karen Spears Zacharias

about 7 months ago

I used to believe in healthy dialogue. Trump and this administration changed all that for me. There can be no healthy dialogue between those who support racism and cruelty. Clearly, that's not what you have done, nor suggesting. But over the course of the past decade, I've lost many a dear friendship because they stood by a man who has proven to the world that he is as cruel as they come. Even today there are some very prominent people suggesting that Trump is going to announce war on Venezuela, a country that hasn't committed any acts of aggression towards us. Why is he doing this? For the same reason Putin invaded Ukraine - they have something he wants and he doesn't care who is killed or harmed in the process of his taking it. I've lived through such an experience. Lost through such an experience. Paid a lifetime cost for such a decision. As to whether Trump is a better choice of a president than Kamala Harris, you an I disagree, politely but vehemently on that issue. Reports suggested that Ted Bundy was a good boyfriend to his girlfriend and her daughter at the same time he was raping and murdering dozens of other women. That did not make Bundy a good choice. Or a good person. Trump has reportedly raped a 13-year-old girl along with Epstein. He most certainly has seuxally assaulted numerous women and gone on to brag about it. Should that keep him from serving in our nation's highest office? Yes. He should be barred from serving for those reasons alone. As far as I know Harris has never seuxally assaulted anyone. That alone sets her up as a better candidate.

Reply

Travis

about 7 months ago

Hi Karen, Thank you for responding. To step into this a little bit: Even if all you suggest is true and without disputing over the facts, I am unsure from a philosophical point of view, assuming one had to choose between only two options, whether it would not be better to have a narcissistic, sexually immoral, abuser as president than a president that would deliver the country over to Marxism and oppression. From a utilitarian point of view anyway, the number of people harmed (and the degree to which they would be harmed) by the United States and its principles of liberty and democracy being lost would seem to be greater than the harm done, though great, on a personal level by an immoral president who still would preserve the liberty and Constitutional structure of the country. As I said, though, I did not vote for President Trump in 2024. This was because I felt in prayer that I should not.

Reply

Karen Spears Zacharias

about 7 months ago

Travis: Your scenario makes a couple of assumptions, false ones, I think. You assume that not electing Trump (a confirmed sex abuser, and by all accounts an amoral if not outright immoral being) leads voters with no choice other than a Marxist in office. I suppose you mean to imply that Kamala Harris is a Marxist. Where's your evidence of that? Moreover, you assume that under Trump there is no oppression. The hundreds of people who have been taken hostage by Trump's DHS would likely disagree with you about that, including the 30 some who have died while locked up in these for profit detention centers. Their families would undoubtedly disagree with you about who is more likely to oppress people. And as a woman, and the mother of daughters, I can most assuredly attest to the oppression that Trump has authored. So, we disagree yet again. Glad you didn't vote for him in 2024, though.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Please be polite. We appreciate that.
Your email address will not be published and required fields are marked


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

PHP Code Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com